.
Feedback

Conversations With Health: Buying Organic, A Manifesto

Buying organic is worth the difference in cost, since in doing so we support an entire range of practices that benefit not only our bodies but the long-term health of the planet.

by Christopher Hassett

I’m continually hearing from family and friends that I should only be buying organic. For the difference in price, is organic really that much better?  --Mitchell

Buying organic is worth the difference in cost, since in doing so we support an entire range of practices that benefit not only our bodies but the long-term health of the planet.  We are living in a time when the global agribusiness is consuming and destroying every aspect of our environment, from our soils to ground wells to rivers and gulf-waters, our few remaining woodlands, to the very air we breathe.  The immediate consequence is that we ourselves, our bodies and minds, are similarly being compromised: our body tissue, blood and respiratory system, all of which have correlatives in the soil, water and air of our earth, are now in a general state of imbalance and decline, and this has everything to do with the mounting impacts of industrial farming.  

When the environment we move through begins to fail we should absolutely be concerned, and things are indeed failing all around us.  Consider, for instance, the massive dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico, an area as large as 7000 square miles, which is annually killed off by agricultural pollutants washed out from the Mississippi River, itself now wholly poisoned by a slurry of pesticides, fertilizers, animal wastes and an enormous yearly run-off of toxic soils from commercial farms the river high.  And this one dead zone replicates numerous others around the world, all rendered lifeless by an corporate agri-complex that profits handsomely in the ruin.  

Consider as well the produce in our markets that is now as contaminated with pesticides as the groundwater used to cultivate it.  Consider farmers who breathe in these pesticides, pesticides they are forced to buy lest they be promptly muscled out of the business, only to die at alarmingly high rates from respiratory disease, organ failure and cancer.  Consider the animals on these industrial farms who we in turn eat as chicken breast or filet or pork loin or pâté -- these animals are routinely shovel-fed their own waste along with the minced bodies of other animals who commonly drop mid-step from organ failure or disease or from the sheer exhaustion of a lifetime of  abuse and fear.  

These same animals are pumped regularly with arsenic (yes, arsenic!) and antibiotics to help cut down on parasites and infections (with the bonus from arsenic of adding an appetizing color to the flesh) and growth hormones that work so incredibly well that legs tend to snap under the freakish weight of their synthetically swollen bodies.  The solution for this trifle annoyance?  Chop off the legs and let the beast languish in its own excrement until, no hurry, it’s ready for slaughter.  And there is no better word, for they are indeed slaughtered in ways that would, were they human, be considered crimes against humanity; in other words, their deaths are unimaginably more inhumane than was their entire existence on “The Farm.”  

Yet all of this is supported in the marketplace by our dollar, which in turn is supported by our unique expectation, culturally speaking, for cheap produce, dairy and meat.  No other country has such unrealistic expectations, but then no other country has so contentedly given over its power, principles and pristine lands as we have in the last half century, all for the luxury of having low cost eggs and two dollar burgers.

There are alternatives to this mad-cow system, and buying organic is an excellent first choice.  Despite the regulating fiasco for conventional farming, organic practices are fairly well monitored in the US.  Animals raised under organic guidelines cannot be fed antibiotics or growth hormones, nor can their DNA be genetically re-engineered to produce more desirable, i.e. profitable, traits; excrement and dead bodies cannot be mixed in with the feed; access to the outdoors must be allowed for all animals, including access to pasture-land for grazing.  A mere few decades ago this was considered normal practice; today it is called enlightened farming, and it is one we should support.

Produce grown organically cannot be chemically fertilized, cannot be genetically modified, cannot be irradiated for longer shelf life.  Raw sewage can’t be pumped onto the soil.  Needless to say, food grown organically tastes better and is substantially more nutritious than conventionally grown crops.  It is higher in vitamins, minerals, and higher even in actual weight.  Perhaps the cost difference in your question is perfectly addressed here, for when dried, organically grown crops weigh as much as 95% more than their conventional counterparts, which means more actual food content.  So if you’re spending 50% more on an organic apple and getting 95% more apple, then the differences in cost will often even out.

But if the dollar remains your fixed bottom line, and I understand how this is the reality for many of us today, then not everything you buy need be organic.  For purely ethical reasons I still strongly encourage all animal products be purchased organic, no matter the difference in cost.  Go a step further and look for labels that say “pasture raised” or “grass fed,” since these more specific labels lets us know that the animal has indeed spent a good portion of its life in a more spacious outdoors.  Some health food stores now help us in making better choices by rating how well an animal has lived, how well it’s been cared for during its time on the farm, which beyond the euphemism is time spent in preparation for our plates.  

Consider that one idea alone when weighing the price of your meal: this animal you are buying for dinner lived its entire life for that single purpose, for that moment when you will cook it and eat it.  So is the life of that chicken worth eight dollars or twelve?  Eight dollars equates to a life of cruelty and absolute misery; twelve to some standard far better.  Your four dollars changes everything, including the energetic value of what you will be putting into your body.

With produce, however, you can shop more thriftily and traditionally while still being aware of what tends to be harmful on the conventional shelves.  A conventional apple, for instance, is laced with 40 different pesticides, many of which cannot be washed off.  You will eat those pesticides, absorb them, and years later there will be a greater potential for things to go amiss.  Celery, strawberries and peaches sit in our stores like art in their perfection, yet on their skins await 60 different pesticides ready for our consumption.  Spinach has 50.  These five top the dozen or so foods (all listed online) that you should definitely avoid when selecting conventional.  Buy them organic without any hesitation.  Avocados, on the other hand, along with lemons, oranges, watermelons, onions, garlic, and anything else that peels away to a protected inner flesh, these you really don’t need to buy organic if money is of concern.  

It’s time for us all to take a stand against the noxious practices of industrial farming, not only to protect our own vulnerable bodies, which are notably larger and sicker than ever before in history, but to also to protect the irreplaceable resources of this earth, which each day vanish before our very eyes.

Christopher Hassett is a life coach and teacher of self awareness.  You can reach him through his website at www.threeperfections.com.  Do you have a question you’d like Christopher to respond to in his column?  Email him at conversations@threeperfections.com.

joe brewer November 28, 2012 at 09:39 pm
Anything like avacado, bananas or pineapple which have a skin you do not eat is a waste of money to pay extra for organic.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Leesburg Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Winchester June 7, 2013 at 02:38 am
HB2313 is the first step in many years towards improving significant Virginia transportation issues.Read More It very importantly provides money for neglected safety inspections of bridges, roads and tunnels - to avoid recent disastrous situations like the Minnesota and Washington bridge collapses. 3800 bridges in Virginia have already been deemed sub-standard. HB2313 also significantly increases the percentage of new infrastructure transportation funds raised in and allocated to NoVa, from 30% to 100%. It also provides funding for the estimated $1B in state construction needs (increasing at a yearly rate of $500M). Finally, the tax increases (and decreases) involved are a small percentage of the already very low Virginia transportation budget and low state taxes (compared to most other states). Delegate May has said in recent interviews that he is usually not in favor of raising taxes - though transportation safety is extremely important - as is keeping NoVa transportation dollars in NoVa. He also said he will ensure there is very careful scrutiny of how the money raised by this bill will be spent.
Michael June 10, 2013 at 03:11 am
The $6.1B in additional tax revenues from transportation bill HB2313 are to be generated over theRead More next five years - which works out to about an additional $145 per person per year - less than the cost of one night at a nice hotel....
Susan June 3, 2013 at 02:34 pm
Interesting article. What worked for me was a program by nutritionist Isabel De Los Rios. If itRead More helps anybody else details of her weight loss plan can be found here: http://www.wowitworked.com/fast-weight-loss/
Ken Wall June 3, 2013 at 02:05 am
Previously there has been nowhere near enough money in the Virginia budget to address current localRead More transportation issues - Virginia transportation spending has continually been almost the lowest in the country (45th of 50 states in 2011) - and the significant local population and economic growth rates have made the issue worse quickly. Note Virginia taxes are also some of the lowest in the country (34th of 50 states in 2011). A large number of politicians across Virginia are involved in resolving the complex and expensive transportation issues in our area - no one person alone is completely responsible - significant negotiating, compromising and patience - traits and skills which LaRock does not possess - are required. A significant step forward was made with recent HB2313, with the help of Delegate May, which allocates significantly more transportation money to our district.
Michael June 10, 2013 at 03:11 am
The $6.1B in additional tax revenues from transportation bill HB2313 are to be generated over theRead More next five years - which works out to about an additional $145 per person per year - less than the cost of one night at a nice hotel....
joe brewer June 11, 2013 at 09:31 am
The 17.5 cent gas tax has been reduced a few cents for a year or two but will be back up there asRead More the wholesale gas tax increases automatically. Northern Virginia will be getting about 180 million of this new tax burden. Using the Pacific Blvd numbers that's 10 miles worth of road. Being shortchanged for 20 years with Northern Virginia getting back 30 cents on a dollar for roads is on Joe May. He did not work to get the formula adjusted. The gas tax was a tax on people who bought gas the new bill and the numbers above include every man, woman and child being taxed 145 dollars a increase of 50% over the gas tax alone plus the additional tax base.