.
Feedback

Board’s Message Directed to School Administration

Supervisors bypass School Board to challenge school administrators to find cost savings.

One of my favorite moments of this baseball season occurred when Philadelphia Phillies pitcher Cole Hamels and Nats rookie Bryce Harper faced one another for the first time in the Major Leagues. In that first at bat, Hamels plunked Harper in the back.

Hamels later admitted that he was sending Harper a message: “Welcome to the big leagues, Kid.”

Then, Harper responded in the best possible way, with a message of his own. After advancing to third base on a single, he pulled off one of the rarest and most thrilling feats in baseball – he stole home.

Harper’s message for Hamels: “Mess with me and I’ll make you pay.”

Messages sent and received.

I remember when sending messages weren’t just about testosterone and macho posturing. Sending a message was something a castaway did after corking a note in a bottle. A message might be a series of dots and dashes tapped using a telegraph key. Or maybe it was a letter that a nine-year-old wrote carefully on lined notebook paper and mailed to a pen pal in Scotland.

But now “sending a message” has become SENDING A MESSAGE, one of the most overused clichés in sports.

Winning the first game in a series isn’t merely being victorious in that game, it is SENDING A MESSAGE. Or, just as bad, MAKING A STATEMENT.

In essence, the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors was simply puffing out its collective chest and SENDING A MESSAGE last week when it approved a motion that gave fiscal guidance to the county administrator and Loudoun County Public Schools regarding next year’s budget.

The board directed the county administrator to present a budget three cents below the equalized tax rate, with all of the impacts of the three-cent reduction to be borne by the school system. The same “guidance” was provided to the school system in preparing its budget.

The problem with this is that the board of supervisors lacks the authority to tell the school board how big its budget request can be. Ashburn District Supervisor Ralph Buona, who made the motion, admitted as much.

He acknowledged that the school board is free to present its budget as it sees fit, and that the supervisors’ action was symbolic. He even admitted that three cents was an arbitrary reduction, and could just as well have been “x cents.”

But Buona and some of his colleagues said they were frustrated with the school administration. He made it clear that he was frustrated with the school staff, not the school board.

“I have total confidence in school board,” Buona said. “I don’t have total confidence in the administration to do what needs to be done to lead the School Board to the right conclusions.”

Buona said that the school staff had not been forthcoming with information requested by the Government Reform Commission, which the board appointed. Leesburg Supervisor Ken Reid said that the school staff was stonewalling the GRC.

Buona complained that the school staff had presented the requested information to the school board rather than the GRC. But this is hardly surprising, since the school administration reports to the School Board, not the GRC.

Broad Run Supervisor Shawn Williams agreed that the school administration had not been cooperative, and that the board needed to send the school staff a strong message to look for operational inefficiencies.

All of this messaging from the board really amounts to a bleat of frustration with the way government works in Loudoun County.

There is an inherent conflict between the school board and the board of supervisors. Members of both bodies are elected directly by the voters, but only one – the board of supervisors – has taxing authority. So every year the school board has to tell the board of supervisors how much money it needs to run the school system and hope for the best.

The board of supervisors is venting its frustration that it doesn’t control the school staff. Of course it doesn’t; the school board does. So it seems a little odd that the supervisors are bypassing the school board and sending their messages directly to the school staff.

We are left with the same standoff we see every year.

The board of supervisors has made its first pitch high and tight. The game will continue. More messages will be sent. And in the end, the board will have to hope that the game doesn’t end with its adversary circling the bases and stealing home.

Anthony Fasolo October 11, 2012 at 01:26 pm
No one likes to pay taxes but unless we find another way to fund our school system, other than through property taxes,we will have to do so. How much we pay depends on what we want from our schools. Do we want students who will contribute to society in a meaningful way and improve our lives? If so we have to look at how to do this. Increasing class size is definitely one way NOT to do this. I speak from experience after trying to teach 43 fourth grade students in Philadelphia--it does not work. I am a sub. teacher now here in Loudoun County, "the richest county in the nation", and was recently in a class of 27 third graders, that is "pushing the envelope" since they have many questions as they are learning many new concepts. So instead of giving a "number" to the school system we should be looking at what is important and then fund it, prioritizing the most important thing first(TEACHERS). " If you think Education is expensive, try Ignorance"
DJ October 11, 2012 at 06:41 pm
A bit of history is handy here, for anyone from elsewhere.
The previous BOS rarely wanted to put the brakes on Hatrick. Therefore, we got constant property tax increases from them, all disguised as "it's growth that drives all of this!". They caved in to Hatrick all the time This while they also refused to accommodate the commercial tax base that can sustain it. Business was ALWAYS the bad boogeyman. They were all finally booted out of office, since we do have thinking voters who finally had enough. So, the new BOS is asking them to find some restraint, in advance and try not to play their famous shell game. If the average class is 27 students, then the unions ask it to be 20. If it is 20, they ask for 15. If it were one teacher for every student, they'd ask for 2 teachers for every student, all while telling us we are deliberately denying "the children" their education and destroying their futures. Oh my. It is amazing that so many immigrants come here, well-educated, from far less prosperous circumstances. That is because their education system did not coddle them or treat them as china dolls. They realized that education is mostly a self-driven asset, and that money spent is not the deciding factor to becoming educated. Yes, it costs money to run schools. But there need to be limits to this endless spiral and gaming. Nationally, I am not sure that will happen, but at least here in Loudoun, we've had enough of it.
Guess October 11, 2012 at 07:37 pm
Just FYI there are NO unions for teachers in VA!!!!!
Marcus Aurelius October 12, 2012 at 03:56 am
Take a look at the student performance in the different school systems in NoVA. Loudoun County Public Schools is certainly not as spendthrift as the ultra-conservative Republican BoS wants to make it out to be. This Board uses intimidation trying to control the school budget, but the parents of LCPS students will not tolerate turning this school system into a Walmartized, bargain basement system. The children of Loudoun deserve the best we can give them!
DJ October 12, 2012 at 12:06 pm
There is nothing about LCPS that is "bargain basement". Quite the opposite. It is time to get it under control.
For parents who prefer other districts that sprnd more per student, they shoudl relocate there. The District, for instance, spends more per student than almost any school system on earth. Surely, then, they have excellent schools? Why not take you children there? Or enroll them in a private school. Instead, we get "Gimme more for MY kids!". And one big souce of that money (property taxes) would be people on fixed incomes, like seniors. And those of us who chose to give this planet a break from more human overload and not have them. Maybe these folks needa t-shirt that shows one of our countless yuppie familes screaming "Hey Gramps, sign over your social security check to LCPS NOW!"

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Leesburg Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Winchester June 7, 2013 at 02:38 am
HB2313 is the first step in many years towards improving significant Virginia transportation issues.Read More It very importantly provides money for neglected safety inspections of bridges, roads and tunnels - to avoid recent disastrous situations like the Minnesota and Washington bridge collapses. 3800 bridges in Virginia have already been deemed sub-standard. HB2313 also significantly increases the percentage of new infrastructure transportation funds raised in and allocated to NoVa, from 30% to 100%. It also provides funding for the estimated $1B in state construction needs (increasing at a yearly rate of $500M). Finally, the tax increases (and decreases) involved are a small percentage of the already very low Virginia transportation budget and low state taxes (compared to most other states). Delegate May has said in recent interviews that he is usually not in favor of raising taxes - though transportation safety is extremely important - as is keeping NoVa transportation dollars in NoVa. He also said he will ensure there is very careful scrutiny of how the money raised by this bill will be spent.
Michael June 10, 2013 at 03:11 am
The $6.1B in additional tax revenues from transportation bill HB2313 are to be generated over theRead More next five years - which works out to about an additional $145 per person per year - less than the cost of one night at a nice hotel....
Susan June 3, 2013 at 02:34 pm
Interesting article. What worked for me was a program by nutritionist Isabel De Los Rios. If itRead More helps anybody else details of her weight loss plan can be found here: http://www.wowitworked.com/fast-weight-loss/
Ken Wall June 3, 2013 at 02:05 am
Previously there has been nowhere near enough money in the Virginia budget to address current localRead More transportation issues - Virginia transportation spending has continually been almost the lowest in the country (45th of 50 states in 2011) - and the significant local population and economic growth rates have made the issue worse quickly. Note Virginia taxes are also some of the lowest in the country (34th of 50 states in 2011). A large number of politicians across Virginia are involved in resolving the complex and expensive transportation issues in our area - no one person alone is completely responsible - significant negotiating, compromising and patience - traits and skills which LaRock does not possess - are required. A significant step forward was made with recent HB2313, with the help of Delegate May, which allocates significantly more transportation money to our district.
Michael June 10, 2013 at 03:11 am
The $6.1B in additional tax revenues from transportation bill HB2313 are to be generated over theRead More next five years - which works out to about an additional $145 per person per year - less than the cost of one night at a nice hotel....
joe brewer June 11, 2013 at 09:31 am
The 17.5 cent gas tax has been reduced a few cents for a year or two but will be back up there asRead More the wholesale gas tax increases automatically. Northern Virginia will be getting about 180 million of this new tax burden. Using the Pacific Blvd numbers that's 10 miles worth of road. Being shortchanged for 20 years with Northern Virginia getting back 30 cents on a dollar for roads is on Joe May. He did not work to get the formula adjusted. The gas tax was a tax on people who bought gas the new bill and the numbers above include every man, woman and child being taxed 145 dollars a increase of 50% over the gas tax alone plus the additional tax base.