.
Feedback

Council Approves Special Exception for Courthouse Square

Leesburg Town Council approves parking structure for major downtown mixed-use project.

A divided Leesburg Town Council voted on March 27 to approve a special exception that will allow structured parking for the Courthouse Square project in downtown Leesburg.

The town’s had recommended denial of the application earlier this month, while town staff had recommended conditional approval of the special exception.

Calling it “a terrific opportunity for a structured parking garage as part of this project,” Council Member Katie Hammler made the motion to approve the special exception.

Council Member Marty Martinez pointed out that the town had considered building a parking garage on the site years ago, and that with the approval of this project, a private developer would instead bear the cost of the parking structure.

The 336-square parking garage is part of the Courthouse Square project that is proposed for a 1.7-acre site in the block bounded by Market, Church, Loudoun and King streets in downtown Leesburg, behind the existing building.

As planned, Courthouse Square would include 113,650 square feet of office space, shops and restaurants.

Under the B-1 zoning for the property, the Courthouse Square development could be built “by right” – without the need for the council’s approval. The council’s vote on Tuesday was to allow a special exception for the parking structure. In separate votes, the council also approved interim waivers to reduce the amount of parking spaces that would be required, and the relocation of three metered street parking spaces.

Although the votes mostly pertained to parking, much of the public comment that preceded the vote, as well as the council’s deliberations, concerned the overall Courthouse Square project.

Several speakers said that the project is out of scale with the character of downtown Leesburg. Others, including the owners of several downtown buildings, raised concerns about traffic congestion and the blasting that would be required to build two levels of parking below ground.

“I think you’re trying to put ten pounds of apples in a five-pound bag,” said downtown businessman Stanley Caulkins.

“This is the heart and soul of Leesburg,” said downtown property owner Ad Barnes. “Once this big project comes in here, you cannot undo it.”

Supporters said that the project would add up to 500 jobs in the downtown, which would help revitalize the area, and that it would provide a link between Market Station and businesses on King and Market streets.

“It is such an opportunity that not only meets our economic motives…it hits all the key things that we are looking for in this town,” said Leesburg resident Don Ashbaugh. “We have a very unique opportunity here to capture this great project.”

Mayor Kristen C. Umstattd and Council Member C. Terry Titus opposed the special exception. Titus raised several concerns, including the size of the project, traffic, blasting and fire safety. “I don’t think this building looks anything like the downtown,” he said.

Umstattd’s comments were even more pointed. “I see in this the beginning of the end for the historic district in downtown Leesburg,” she said.

Vice Mayor Kevin D. Wright and Council Members Hammler, Martinez and David S. Butler all voted in favor of the special exception, citing the economic benefits of the project and the additional parking spaces the structure would provide. Council Member Thomas S. Dunn was absent for the vote.

The Board of Architectural Review will be the next step in the public approval process for the Courthouse Square project.

Susan Horne March 28, 2012 at 06:50 pm
Goodbye Leesburg's goal of being a 24/7 downtown. What happened to encouraging downtown residential?? This action by the Leesburg Town Council spells the beginning of the end for historic downtown Leesburg's uniqueness and charm, and makes it yet another downtown taken over by over-scaled, institutional uses (isn't Loudoun County looking at this for additional office space?). One only needs to drive through (on the one-way streets) downtown Fairfax to see how quickly the historic buildings' scale and architectural character are undermined by large institutional uses.
kathleen fergus March 28, 2012 at 07:38 pm
Greed, greed, greed. It always wins out.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Leesburg Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Winchester June 7, 2013 at 02:38 am
HB2313 is the first step in many years towards improving significant Virginia transportation issues.Read More It very importantly provides money for neglected safety inspections of bridges, roads and tunnels - to avoid recent disastrous situations like the Minnesota and Washington bridge collapses. 3800 bridges in Virginia have already been deemed sub-standard. HB2313 also significantly increases the percentage of new infrastructure transportation funds raised in and allocated to NoVa, from 30% to 100%. It also provides funding for the estimated $1B in state construction needs (increasing at a yearly rate of $500M). Finally, the tax increases (and decreases) involved are a small percentage of the already very low Virginia transportation budget and low state taxes (compared to most other states). Delegate May has said in recent interviews that he is usually not in favor of raising taxes - though transportation safety is extremely important - as is keeping NoVa transportation dollars in NoVa. He also said he will ensure there is very careful scrutiny of how the money raised by this bill will be spent.
Michael June 10, 2013 at 03:11 am
The $6.1B in additional tax revenues from transportation bill HB2313 are to be generated over theRead More next five years - which works out to about an additional $145 per person per year - less than the cost of one night at a nice hotel....
Susan June 3, 2013 at 02:34 pm
Interesting article. What worked for me was a program by nutritionist Isabel De Los Rios. If itRead More helps anybody else details of her weight loss plan can be found here: http://www.wowitworked.com/fast-weight-loss/
Ken Wall June 3, 2013 at 02:05 am
Previously there has been nowhere near enough money in the Virginia budget to address current localRead More transportation issues - Virginia transportation spending has continually been almost the lowest in the country (45th of 50 states in 2011) - and the significant local population and economic growth rates have made the issue worse quickly. Note Virginia taxes are also some of the lowest in the country (34th of 50 states in 2011). A large number of politicians across Virginia are involved in resolving the complex and expensive transportation issues in our area - no one person alone is completely responsible - significant negotiating, compromising and patience - traits and skills which LaRock does not possess - are required. A significant step forward was made with recent HB2313, with the help of Delegate May, which allocates significantly more transportation money to our district.
Michael June 10, 2013 at 03:11 am
The $6.1B in additional tax revenues from transportation bill HB2313 are to be generated over theRead More next five years - which works out to about an additional $145 per person per year - less than the cost of one night at a nice hotel....
joe brewer June 11, 2013 at 09:31 am
The 17.5 cent gas tax has been reduced a few cents for a year or two but will be back up there asRead More the wholesale gas tax increases automatically. Northern Virginia will be getting about 180 million of this new tax burden. Using the Pacific Blvd numbers that's 10 miles worth of road. Being shortchanged for 20 years with Northern Virginia getting back 30 cents on a dollar for roads is on Joe May. He did not work to get the formula adjusted. The gas tax was a tax on people who bought gas the new bill and the numbers above include every man, woman and child being taxed 145 dollars a increase of 50% over the gas tax alone plus the additional tax base.