.
Feedback

Finance Committee Endorses Plan for Holiday Display

Board of Supervisors will discuss the issue at its second business meeting in July.

In a split vote, the Loudoun County Board of Supervisors’ Finance, Government Services and Operations Committee (FGSOC) on June 11 endorsed a plan to display a Christian nativity scene, Jewish menorah and other holiday decorations on the courthouse grounds.

A divided FGSOC voted to forward the proposed holiday display as recommended by the Courts Grounds and Facilities Committee (CGFC) to the full Board of Supervisors.

Last month, with a mix of religious and secular symbols, including a crèche (Christian nativity scene), menorah, Christmas tree, holiday greenery, and a display featuring Santa Claus and reindeer. The committee also recommended the size, location and other details of the proposed display.

Broad Run District Supervisor Shawn Williams opposed the motion to recommend the proposed display to the full board.

“I just feel as though it continues to bring negative attention to our area,” Williams said.

“I’m not certainly advocating against Christianity because that’s not what I’m about,” he said. “What I’m trying to do is take us out of the limelight.”

He said that the Supreme Court had twice ruled that “you can’t advance one religious faith over another.”

Williams twice asked CGFC chair Clint Good if his committee’s recommended holiday display items were consistent with advice County Attorney Jack Roberts had provided the CGFC in executive session.

Each time, Good responded that he did not feel comfortable answering that question, but later noted that the CGFC’s recommendation was consistent with an opinion issued by Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli.

FGSOC chairman Ralph Buona moved that the issue be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors without a recommendation from the committee.

However, Sterling District Supervisor Eugene Delgaudio objected and made a substitute motion to advance the recommendation that the CGFC had made.

Leesburg District Supervisor Ken Reid concurred, saying that sending the issue to the full board without a recommendation would give the impression that the supervisors were unsure of the work of the CGFC.

“If we don’t [make a recommendation], we’re just going to create a lot of controversy and a lot of people are going to be thinking that the Board is backing off,” Reid said.

With board chairman Scott York absent from the meeting, it appeared that the FGSOC was deadlocked at 2-2-1. Buona then grudgingly voted in favor of Delgaudio’s substitute motion, to “break the logjam.”

The Board of Supervisors will consider the issue at its second business meeting in July.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Leesburg Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Kristen H June 12, 2012 at 04:24 pm
Thank you again for your coverage of this issue, Jim! I was very happy to see the Supervisors taking the legal ramifications as well as the effects on Leesburg's image into account.
One thing that concerned me was Committee Chairman Good's characterization of the committee's decision as "unanimous". Committee member Roy Liggett voted against a creche and menorah (and made some great comments to you, reflected here: http://leesburg.patch.com/articles/committee-finalizes-holiday-display-recommendations). Yesterday, if I heard correctly, the vote was characterized as an abstention. If anyone is curious, the minutes to the May meeting in question are here: http://va-loudouncounty.civicplus.com/archives/106/May%208,%202012%20Minutes.pdf. I don't think there was any ill intent in this mistake, but I don't want it to cause the Supervisors to believe that the votes were unanimous. Committee member Liggett made some great points when he chose to vote against the displays and I hope they will be understood and taken into consideration by the Board.
John Mileo June 12, 2012 at 05:36 pm
Question to Supervisor Williams: Why the concern over the Supreme Court's decision about appearing to advance one religion over another, when the CGFC has in fact recommended the inclusion of a menorah along with the crèche display, which unless my ability to add is faltering, equals two?
Question to Supervisor Reid: Why the ongoing effort to have the display be reflective of "all religions" when the period under consideration only includes Hanukah and Christmas?
Jim Barnes June 14, 2012 at 12:35 am
Kristen, I think you are correct, although I believe I heard Clint Good later tell the committee that there was one vote against the creche. I gave him the benefit of the doubt because I recall that there was some confusion during the May 8 meeting about Roy Liggett's "no" votes.
But the minutes state that Mr. Liggett voted against both the creche and the menorah and, as you pointed out, he explained his reasoning to me after the meeting.
Kristen H June 14, 2012 at 02:59 am
Jim,
Thanks -- you're right, Clint Good did change it to an abstention a little bit later on, and it was almost glossed over at the meeting itself when he was casting the votes! I was happy to read his comments to you, and I hope that the BoS doesn't discount them.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Winchester June 7, 2013 at 02:38 am
HB2313 is the first step in many years towards improving significant Virginia transportation issues.Read More It very importantly provides money for neglected safety inspections of bridges, roads and tunnels - to avoid recent disastrous situations like the Minnesota and Washington bridge collapses. 3800 bridges in Virginia have already been deemed sub-standard. HB2313 also significantly increases the percentage of new infrastructure transportation funds raised in and allocated to NoVa, from 30% to 100%. It also provides funding for the estimated $1B in state construction needs (increasing at a yearly rate of $500M). Finally, the tax increases (and decreases) involved are a small percentage of the already very low Virginia transportation budget and low state taxes (compared to most other states). Delegate May has said in recent interviews that he is usually not in favor of raising taxes - though transportation safety is extremely important - as is keeping NoVa transportation dollars in NoVa. He also said he will ensure there is very careful scrutiny of how the money raised by this bill will be spent.
Michael June 10, 2013 at 03:11 am
The $6.1B in additional tax revenues from transportation bill HB2313 are to be generated over theRead More next five years - which works out to about an additional $145 per person per year - less than the cost of one night at a nice hotel....
Susan June 3, 2013 at 02:34 pm
Interesting article. What worked for me was a program by nutritionist Isabel De Los Rios. If itRead More helps anybody else details of her weight loss plan can be found here: http://www.wowitworked.com/fast-weight-loss/
Ken Wall June 3, 2013 at 02:05 am
Previously there has been nowhere near enough money in the Virginia budget to address current localRead More transportation issues - Virginia transportation spending has continually been almost the lowest in the country (45th of 50 states in 2011) - and the significant local population and economic growth rates have made the issue worse quickly. Note Virginia taxes are also some of the lowest in the country (34th of 50 states in 2011). A large number of politicians across Virginia are involved in resolving the complex and expensive transportation issues in our area - no one person alone is completely responsible - significant negotiating, compromising and patience - traits and skills which LaRock does not possess - are required. A significant step forward was made with recent HB2313, with the help of Delegate May, which allocates significantly more transportation money to our district.
Michael June 10, 2013 at 03:11 am
The $6.1B in additional tax revenues from transportation bill HB2313 are to be generated over theRead More next five years - which works out to about an additional $145 per person per year - less than the cost of one night at a nice hotel....
joe brewer June 11, 2013 at 09:31 am
The 17.5 cent gas tax has been reduced a few cents for a year or two but will be back up there asRead More the wholesale gas tax increases automatically. Northern Virginia will be getting about 180 million of this new tax burden. Using the Pacific Blvd numbers that's 10 miles worth of road. Being shortchanged for 20 years with Northern Virginia getting back 30 cents on a dollar for roads is on Joe May. He did not work to get the formula adjusted. The gas tax was a tax on people who bought gas the new bill and the numbers above include every man, woman and child being taxed 145 dollars a increase of 50% over the gas tax alone plus the additional tax base.